California Attorney Felipa Richland

Calfornia Attorney Felipa Richland Sanctioned

California attorney Felipa Richland lost a major case where Superior Court issued an award against her and her client, Kourosh Hakimpoor aka Kenny Hakimpoor who was forced to resign his California Corporation Nathan Enterprises Corporation (NEC) . Felipa Richland California attorney was upset she lost yet another lawsuit so appealed. The Court of Appeal found Felipa Richland’s appeals was meritless where it said in part, in Court of Appeal, Second District, Case Number B216582,

“Thus, NEC is not entitled to the tolling provision of section 351 because NEC has not established the necessary factual predicate for application of the statute.” The Court of Appeal also took issue with yet another flawed argument of Felipa Richland Beverly Hills attorney where she did failed to file the lawsuit within the statute of limitation. The court said,

“Because NEC failed to file the underlying action until February 13, 2008, its malicious prosecution claim based on the filing of [second case] was time-barred, and the trial court properly found NEC had no probability of prevailing on that claim.” That’s right, the court said Felipa Richland had “no probability of prevailing” but she still filed the lawsuit in a vexatiously.

The Court of Appeal went on to say discard yet another argument by Felipa Richland,

“Accordingly, NEC has no probability of prevailing on its abuse of process claim. Thus, the second cause of action for abuse of process must be stricken under the anti-SLAPP statute because that claim arises from protected activity and lacks even minimal merit. We now turn to the remaining causes of action.”

And last, the Court of Appeal discarded yet another argument of Felipa Richland when it said, “NEC lacks standing to bring the claims for intentional and negligent infliction of emotional distress.”

It is possible California attorney Felipa Richland consulted with her associate San Diego attorney Scott McMillan who was called a vexatious litigant in other cases. Lytwyn v. Fry’s Electronic devices, Inc. (2005) 126 Cal.App.4 th 1455, 1464; McMillan v. Weathersby (9th Cir. 2002) 31 F.App’x 371, 374. Scott McMillan , McMillan Law Firm, La Mesa, California, was also hauled into federal court on fraud allegations he was forced to settle see press-release.

Is California Attorney Felipa Richland a scam?
California Attorney Felipa Richland is a scam and a bad service provider as per the report filed on dirtyscam.com. They are not aggressive towards their customer satisfaction and complaint grievance.
Is California Attorney Felipa Richland legit?
First California Attorney Felipa Richland is not a legit business owner or provider. You must take necessary precautions/measures before buying or using their services.
How many reviews are submitted by California Attorney Felipa Richland’s consumers?
There is/are 1 review(s) posted about California Attorney Felipa Richland and it indicates that the severity of the scam is Extremely High.
Where is California Attorney Felipa Richland located?
California Attorney Felipa Richland is located at 2625 Townsgate Rd Suite 330, Westlake Village, CA 91361, USA. You can contact California Attorney Felipa Richland by dialing (805) 267-1178 or visit their website N/A before filing a lawsuit. We are no way affiliated with better business bureau or yelp reviews platform.
How much monetary loss is incurred by California Attorney Felipa Richland’s customers?
According to the report(s), US $100000 was the total loss incurred by California Attorney Felipa Richland’s customers.

Rate and write a review on California Attorney Felipa Ric...

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Reviews:0
Reported Loss :100000 $
Severity of Scam :Extremely High
Reported by : Anonymous
Views :